Educate and Punish: The effects of placing young offenders in Closed Educational Centres
(Draft available upon request)
Abstract
Introduced in 2002 as an alternative to juvenile detention when other forms of open placement have failed, Closed educational centres (CEF) aim to create a temporary break from minors’ usual environment by involving them in intensive educational and professional activities and providing enhanced, personalized supervision. This makes them the most resource-intensive non-custodial placement of the French juvenile justice system. Building on administrative records from the Directorate for Youth Judicial Protection between 2012 and 2022, I evaluate their effect on post-placement trajectories by instrumenting actual placement with the local availability of a CEF in the prescriber’s department within pairs of minors observationally identical. I find that CEF placement raises the twelve-month probability of post-spell detention by 19 percentage points, and of a subsequent CEF placement by 22 percentage points. The effect seems to be driven by minors whose alternative would have been a community supervision order, is null on substitution from another residential placement, and is mildly protective on substitution from detention. It is also concentrated on stays cut short before the four-month threshold separating the structured and reinsertion phases of the programme. The closed centre seems to be perform closer to its political design when it displaces incarceration, and produces the worst observable trajectories when it intensifies an ongoing community-supervision. [Forthcoming: Analysis on peer effects. Depending on the possibility of merging administrative data: analysis on return to education and training, employment and health outcomes.]